New York Seasonal and Holiday Employees

Posted in Compensation, GT Alert, minimum wage, New York, New York Department of Labor, overtime, Paid Leave, Sexual Harrassment, State Law

The holidays are upon us, NYC is bustling with tourists, and, with the typical surge in business this time of year, employers may be thinking about adding a few employees to their December and January schedules. This GT Alert provides important considerations with respect to those seasonal employment offers, including minimum wage, sexual harassment training, NYC’s Paid Safe and Sick Leave Law, New York’s Workers’ Compensation Law, disability benefits, and child labor laws.

Click here to read the full GT Alert.

Reminder: Jan. 1, 2020, Effective Date Quickly Approaching for New Overtime Rules

Posted in Compensation, Department of Labor, Employee Classifications, Federal Law, FLSA, GT Alert, overtime

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) final rule raising the annual minimum salary requirements for the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime exemptions for executive, administrative, and professional employees is effective Jan. 1, 2020.

Employers who have not yet begun or completed their audit and review of their employee classifications should immediately start the process to be prepared for the implementation of this significant new rule, which could result in the reclassification of as many as 1.3 million currently exempt employees as non-exempt.

For details on the final rule, including the salary level for these “white collar” exemptions, see our September 2019 GT Alert, Department of Labor Announces Final Changes to Overtime Rules.

Contact your Greenberg Traurig attorney for guidance on compliance with the new rule.

For more on overtime rules, click here.

2019 Employment Law Snapshot: New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania

Posted in GT Alert, Labor & Employment, Legislation, minimum wage, New Jersey, New York, overtime, Paid Leave, Pennsylvania

In 2019, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania each enacted substantial legislation affecting companies that employ individuals in those states. This GT Alert provides a summary of the most significant of these legislative changes and will help employers stay abreast of the changes relevant to their businesses. Please note that the laws described extend protections to employees who work in the state and therefore can affect out-of-state employers.

Click here for the full GT Alert, “2019 Employment Law Snapshot: New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.”

California Labor & Employment Legislative Update 2019 – Spoiler Alert, Things Have Not Moderated

Posted in California, Labor & Employment, Sexual Harrassment, State Law

Gov. Newsom signed 870 bills into law and vetoed 172. Fortunately, not all of them were labor and employment related. This GT Alert provides an overview of the new employment-related laws, which will likely create additional challenges for California employers. As always, we focus here on what is likely to be important as opposed to everything tangentially employment-related in some way.

Click here for the full GT Alert.

Employment and Pension Law Update 2019: The Netherlands

Posted in Benefits, Employment Agreement, GT Alert, Paid Leave, The Netherlands

This GT Alert provides an update on employment and pension law in the Netherlands for 2019. Topics covered include diversity in boards of larger companies; the Balanced Labour Market Act (Wab), effective 1 January 2020; amendments to restructuring rules applied by the Employee Insurance Agency (UWV), effective 1 October 2019; Dutch pension system reforms; and Pending acts and regulations, including Transfer of Undertaking in Bankruptcy Act (Wet overgang van onderneming in faillissement), changes to civil servant status, and extended birth leave. We also provide a list of training courses offered by GT and our areas of concentration in Labor & Employment law in the Netherlands.

Click here to read the full GT Alert.

We May Not Have Until January to Sort Out AB5: Update on Dynamex Retroactivity

Posted in California, class action, Employee Classifications, GT Alert, Independent Contractors, Litigation, State Law

After the California Second District Court of Appeal’s Oct. 8, 2019, decision in Gonzales v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc., brought as a garden variety wage and hour class action claiming various classifications of drivers who agreed to be and were treated as independent contractors were in fact employees, the California Supreme Court will have the final say on whether the ABC test in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court, 4 Cal.5th 903 (2018), generally not well-received by businesses, is a retroactive expression of existing law, or prospective only.

Click here to read the full GT Alert, “We May Not Have Until January to Sort Out AB5: Update on Dynamex Retroactivity.”

Reminder: Oct. 9, 2019, Deadline Approaches for New York Sexual Harassment Prevention Training

Posted in Discrimination, GT Alert, New York, Sexual Harrassment, State Law

New York employers have until Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2019, to train each of their employees on sexual harassment prevention. The training must be conducted annually thereafter, and must satisfy all of the statutory requirements for content and interaction. Employers who have not yet conducted training should do so as soon as possible. For more information, including training parameters, see our October 2018 GT Alert here.

Contact your Greenberg Traurig attorney to schedule training or for guidance on compliance with these training requirements and related employment laws.

For more on laws and other legal developments related to sexual harassment in the workplace, click here.

Department of Labor Announces Final Changes to Overtime Rules

Posted in Compensation, Department of Labor, Employee Classifications, Employee Policies, FLSA, GT Alert, overtime

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) on Sept. 24, 2019, announced a final rule raising the annual minimum salary requirements for the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime exemptions for executive, administrative, and professional employees. The final rule, effective Jan. 1, 2020, will significantly impact businesses. Experts predict the rule could result in the reclassification of as many as 1.3 million currently exempt employees as non-exempt.

Under the final rule, the salary level for these “white collar” exemptions will increase from $23,660 per year ($455 per week) to $35,568 per year ($684 per week). In this respect, the final rule increases the salary level a few dollars per week more than the original rule proposed on March 7, 2019.

Click here to read the full GT Alert, “Department of Labor Announces Final Changes to Overtime Rules.”

AB5 Update: California Legislature Seeks Shake-Up of Gig Economy; Any Impact of CA Independent Contractor Laws on Franchisors Remains Unclear

Posted in California, GT Alert, Independent Contractors

On Sept. 18, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) into law. AB5, effective Jan. 1, 2020, seeks to codify and clarify a California Supreme Court case (Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles), which dramatically changed the standard for determining whether workers in California should be classified as employees or as independent contractors. Specifically, the Dynamex court held there is a presumption that workers are employees, and placed the burden on an entity classifying an individual as an independent contractor to prove that such a classification is proper under a three-part “ABC” test.

Although much of the public debate surrounding AB5 has centered around the “gig economy” (such as ridesharing companies), whether AB5 impacts more traditional business relationships, such as franchisee-franchisor relationships, remains up for debate.

Click here to read the full GT Alert, “AB5 Update: California Legislature Seeks Shake-Up of Gig Economy; Any Impact of CA Independent Contractor Laws on Franchisors Remains Unclear.”

2 Steps Forward, 1 Step Back: California Supreme Court Nixes Plaintiffs’ Ability to Recover Unpaid Wages Under PAGA, but Forecloses Defendants’ Path to Arbitration

Posted in Arbitration, California, GT Alert, Labor & Employment, overtime, State Law

On Sept. 12, 2019, the California Supreme Court in ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court of San Diego County (Lawson) delivered a victory for California employers, clarifying that a plaintiff bringing a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action may not recover as a “civil penalty” the “wages” referenced in Cal. Labor Code section 558, and thereby limited the monetary recovery workers can seek under PAGA.

PAGA allows a plaintiff-employee to seek civil penalties on behalf of the plaintiff and other “aggrieved employees” for a Labor Code violation, if the Labor Commissioner first receives proper notice of the claim and declines to take action on it. Among the Labor Code sections often relied on by plaintiffs in such cases is Labor Code section 558, which enables the Labor Commissioner to collect $50 and $100 in civil penalties against employers that unlawfully deny overtime compensation to workers, and allows the Commissioner to recover “an amount sufficient to recover underpaid wages.” Though PAGA provides that amounts recovered by a private litigant are to be distributed 75% to the state and 25% to “aggrieved employees,” section 558 provides that any wage-based recovery under section 558 goes entirely (100%) to the workers.

Click here for the full GT Alert on the CA Supreme Court decision ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court of San Diego County (Lawson).

LexBlog