On May 1, 2025, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued a field assistance bulletin providing guidance to the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division staff about the “analysis to apply when determining employee or independent contractor status for purposes of enforcing the FLSA.” The DOL is in the process of evaluating the issue and working on establishing the appropriate standard to address this question of the standard for determining worker classification under the FLSA.

Under the Biden administration, the DOL issued a ruleEmployee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (2024 Rule)—outlining the analysis for determining employee or independent contractor status under the FLSA. The 2024 Rule specified that six factors would be considered to evaluate the nature of the workers’ status, but no single factor was dispositive. These factors were (1) worker opportunities for profit or loss, (2) worker and potential employer investments, (3) work relationship permanence, (4) employer control over work, (5) extent to which work performed was integral to employer’s business, and (6) use of worker skill and initiative.

The DOL will no longer apply this analysis. Instead, until a new standard is issued, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division will enforce the FLSA based on Fact Sheet #13 (2008) and as further informed by Opinion Letter FLSA2019-6 (which the Biden administration withdrew but is now reinstated as FLSA2025-2). Fact Sheet #13 emphasized that there is no “single rule or test” for determining worker classification, but there are seven significant factors to consider:

  1. the extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business;
  2. the permanency of the relationship;
  3. the amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment;
  4. the nature and degree of control by the principal;
  5. the alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss;
  6. the amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor; and
  7. the degree of independent business organization and operation.

Fact Sheet #13 also highlighted that certain factors are “immaterial” to the analysis. These factors include (1) place where work is performed, (2) absence of formal employment agreement, (3) whether the alleged independent contractor is licensed by the state/local government, and (4) the time or mode of pay.

The now-reinstated Opinion Letter FLSA2019-6, issued during the first Trump administration, outlines the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division’s position on gig economy worker classification. The letter analyzes the status of workers who are engaged through a virtual marketplace platform.

Since these workers were not economically dependent on the virtual marketplace platform, did not have a permanent working relationship with the platform, are able to switch to working for different platforms, have opportunities for profit and loss (even if the platform sets prices), are not integrated into the platform (e.g., they do not develop, maintain, or operate the platform), and the platform did not invest in facilities or equipment for the workers, the workers could be classified as independent contractors.

While the DOL continues to evaluate the appropriate standard, stakeholders should exercise heightened caution when structuring working relationships and reexamine current classifications in light of this regulatory shift.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Lindsay E. Hutner Lindsay E. Hutner

Lindsay E. Hutner is Co-Chair of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice’s Employment Litigation & Trials Group. Lindsay is a focused, practical, and dedicated litigator, whose clients trust her to not only vehemently defend their interests, but offer pragmatic, no-nonsense advice, all with

Lindsay E. Hutner is Co-Chair of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice’s Employment Litigation & Trials Group. Lindsay is a focused, practical, and dedicated litigator, whose clients trust her to not only vehemently defend their interests, but offer pragmatic, no-nonsense advice, all with an eye toward their business needs. She works closely with clients in defending both class actions and single-plaintiff cases involving employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour, PAGA, unfair competition, enforcement of non-competes and other restrictive covenants, misappropriation of trade secrets, wrongful termination, and breach of contract.

With more than fifteen years of experience collaborating with employers ranging in size from start-ups to large public companies, Lindsay has wide-ranging experience advising employers on virtually all facets of employment relationships. Lindsay regularly counsels clients on all manner of topics, including the design and implementation of employment practices and handbooks, proper employee classification, wage and hour concerns, family and medical leave, workplace investigations, risk assessment of harassment and discrimination claims, terminations, and various employment laws, including the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, California wage and hour laws, Business & Professions Code section 17200, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, California Family Rights Act, the federal Family Medical Leave Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act. She also conducts on-site trainings and workplace audits. She also drafts all types of employment agreements, including executive employment contracts and severance and release agreements.

Lindsay has been invited to speak at a number of programs covering a wide variety of employment law issues and is the co-chair of PLI’s annual conference, Cutting-Edge Employment Law Issues. Lindsay also writes frequently and is the co-editor of PLI’s California Employment Law treatise, and a contributing editor of PLI’s Employment Law Yearbook; both treatises are updated annually and focus on employment law issues for employment law practitioners.

Photo of Syed H. Mannan Syed H. Mannan

Syed H. Mannan is a member of the Labor & Employment Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s New York and San Francisco offices. He represents employers in traditional labor and employment matters. Syed has experience with a wide range of matters involving unfair labor practice

Syed H. Mannan is a member of the Labor & Employment Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s New York and San Francisco offices. He represents employers in traditional labor and employment matters. Syed has experience with a wide range of matters involving unfair labor practice charges, representation elections, collective bargaining negotiations, as well as wage and hour and employee mobility matters.

 Admitted in California. Not admitted in New York.