By March 30, 2026, California employers are required to notify existing employees of the opportunity to identify an emergency contact and to allow employees to designate whether the contact should receive notification if the employee is arrested or detained at the jobsite, during work hours, or offsite while performing their job duties, and the employer has “actual knowledge of the arrest or detention of the employee.” Cal. Lab. Code § 1555(b).

Effective March 30, California employers must allow their employees to update their emergency contact information throughout their employment. Id. If an employee identifies an emergency contact, employers must notify their contact if the employee is arrested or detained under any of the aforementioned circumstances. Id. § 1555(a). California employers must provide employees hired after March 30 the opportunity to provide an emergency contact at the time of hire.

The state has attached potential penalties for an employer’s failure to comply with Section 1555 of the California Labor Code. Specifically, the Labor Code authorizes a $500 penalty “per employee for each day the violation occurs, up to a maximum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per employee.” Id. § 1558(d)(2). Thus, an employer’s failure to notify employees of the opportunity to provide emergency contact information by March 30 and/or an employer’s failure to notify the emergency contact, may lead to penalties recoverable by employees, the California Labor Commissioner’s Office, or a public prosecutor. Id. § 1558(d)(3).

With this deadline approaching, employers should consider notifying all California employees in writing of their right to identify an emergency contact and confirming whether the employee wishes to have that emergency contact notified if the employee is arrested or detained at the jobsite, during work hours, or offsite while performing their job duties, and the employer has actual knowledge of the arrest or detention of the employee.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Timothy Long Timothy Long

Timothy Long, Co-Managing Shareholder of the Sacramento office, has deep experience litigating complex labor and employment issues, having served as lead counsel in multiple class, collective, and representative actions and advising on dozens more. Tim splits his time between GT’s Los Angeles and…

Timothy Long, Co-Managing Shareholder of the Sacramento office, has deep experience litigating complex labor and employment issues, having served as lead counsel in multiple class, collective, and representative actions and advising on dozens more. Tim splits his time between GT’s Los Angeles and Sacramento offices, and is Practice Group Leader of the Sacramento office’s Labor & Employment Practice. Tim’s clients have included a variety of financial institutions and entities, health care-related entities, airlines, retailers, high-tech companies, and transportation and logistics companies. Tim also advises private investment funds and their partners in disputes concerning the management of funds, removal of non-performing members, and disputes involving portfolio companies.

Tim has litigated virtually every wage-and-hour issue there is, including exemption, incentive compensation, independent contractor, off-the-clock, meal and rest, pay practice, and PAGA claims. He also has defeated class and collective certification (including at Stage One) in exemption, off-the-clock, and pay practice cases, and has defeated PAGA claims short of trial. Tim has also litigated a wide variety of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, as well as wrongful termination, defamation, Anti-SLAPP, fraud, emotional distress, breach of contract, and other employment-related claims. Tim has both prosecuted and defended employers in trade secret and unfair business practices litigation. He has also resisted competitor efforts to enjoin the lawful practices of his clients.

Photo of Nathan K. Norimoto Nathan K. Norimoto

Nathan K. Norimoto focuses his practice on representing employers in complex wage-and-hour class and representative actions, as well as single-plaintiff matters involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Nathan litigates in state and federal courts and represents clients in private arbitrations and before…

Nathan K. Norimoto focuses his practice on representing employers in complex wage-and-hour class and representative actions, as well as single-plaintiff matters involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Nathan litigates in state and federal courts and represents clients in private arbitrations and before administrative agencies.

Nathan also counsels and advises clients on state and federal wage-and-hour compliance, updating employee handbooks and policies, and trade secret and employee mobility issues.

Nathan represents employers in matters pertaining to the telecommunications, retail, healthcare, food and beverage, staffing, life sciences, technology, banking, and construction industries.